Background
- PPG 3 sets a 1.5 spaces / dwelling benchmark (but doesn’t justify it)
- adverse reaction to PPG 3
- Ministerial statement: 1.5 is an average for an area over time / is not site specific
- ODPM initiates research in 2003 to report early 2004
- research findings delayed, work extended
- now to report in 2005, possibly with more guidance
Car ownership
- no explicit policy to restrict ownership
- GB car ownership: 1.0 car / household (2001)
- GB forecast: 1.3 cars / household (2031)
- pre-PPG 3 typical standards for 3 bed house:
- 1.5 spaces for residents
- 1.0 space for visitors
- 1 visitor space / dwelling is very luxurious
Presumed ODPM stance
- standard of 1.5 spaces will cope with foreseeable growth in ownership on average
Purpose of paper
- examine background in more detail
- consider findings of Harrison Webb commissions
- suggest ways forward
Harrison Webb experience
- parking standards research: (SEERA)
- parking standards SPG: (E Herts, Stevenage, Herts County Council)
- garage dimensions: (E Herts)
Research on parking standards
for SEERA
- assist development of RTS
- collate existing standards
- check compliance with PPG 13 (non-residential)
- check compliance with PPG 3
- check compliance with RTS (more rigorous than PPG and reflect local accessibility)
Findings: PPG 13
- compliance good at County level
- satisfactory elsewhere
- not all Counties set standards
- not all LPAs agree with Counties
- most authorities now promote variation with accessibility (on some basis)
Findings: PPG 3
- average of 1.5 spaces causing major difficulties
- compliance is poor
Our reaction to findings
- compliance depends on location, but…
- little or no evidence of analyses of housing allocations
- (unprofessional) reliance on policies that “seek to comply….”
Issues for SEERA
- Surrey average: 1.3 cars / household now
- many wards exceed 1.5 cars / household now
- do we know who buys new houses?
- differentiate car ownership and use
- consider urban form
- infrastructure investment in alternatives to car use
SPG on parking standards
in Hertfordshire
- Harrison Webb commissions for:
- Stevenage
- E Herts
- County Council
- introduce spatial variation based on accessibility
Garage dimensions
- research project for E Herts
- garages have multiple uses:
-
storage, including cycles, gardening equipment
- hobbies
- playroom
- utility room
- gym
Issues
- most will be used for some storage
- if too small, car will be parked outside
- standards need to recognise this
- do they…?
Research findings
- many authorities have no minimum standard for internal dimensions
- of those that do:
- smallest 4.5 x 2.4m (less than a parking space)
- largest 6.0 x 3.0m
- storage and cycle parking issue recognised by some
Implications
- include garage dimensions in parking standards and/or design guides
- higher densities increase pressure for multiple use
- to ensure garages are used appropriately:
- provide separate space for cycle parking
- provide adequate storage space in house
- allow alternative garage shapes, but…
- minimum internal area: 15m 2
- minimum length: 5.0m, minimum width 2.75m
- consider layout of development
Overall conclusions
- PPG 13 standards increasingly adopted
- spatial variation becoming the norm
- PPG 3 guidance resisted:
- Member concerns about on-street parking
- market impacts unknown
- back door route to restricting car ownership
A way forward for authorities
- add spatial variation to residential standards based on size / type
- seek communal parking for visitors
- analyse housing allocations
- lobby for more flexibility via RTS
A way forward for ODPM
- recognise that adopted housing allocations vary
- demand major new public transport infrastructure / pedestrian orientation in large developments and maintain 1.5 benchmark
- raise benchmark to 1.75 – 1.95 in less sustainable locations for smaller developments
|